Development and validation of the isiZulu quality of recovery score

Background: Recovery from anaesthesia and surgery is an important marker of the quality of perioperative care. One extensively validated score in assessing this is the Quality of Recovery­15 items (QoR-15) score. This study aimed to translate the QoR-15 score into isiZulu and validate both the original and translated version on an isiZulu speaking population. Methodology: A randomised quantitative observational study was performed testing the original and the translated version of the QoR-15 score. In a crossover format, patients were asked to complete both questionnaires with 40 minutes allowed between each questionnaire. A 100 mm visual analogue score (VAS) was completed by each participant as a comparative tool for overall quality of recovery. Results: There was good correlation between the English and isiZulu score 0.91 (p < 0.001) and substantial agreement between the scores (mean weighted kappa: 0.69). There was a negative correlation between duration of surgery and total QoR-15 scores for both the English (­0.3; p < 0.001) and isiZulu (­0.29; p < 0.001) questionnaires, and a positive correlation between VAS scores and total QoR-15 scores for both the English (0.38; p < 0.001) and isiZulu (0.38; p < 0.001) questionnaires. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the QoR-15 score is suitable to use in an isiZulu speaking patient population. The translated isiZulu version is comparable to the English QoR-15 score and should be used to assess the QoR to improve patient care

National Priorities for Perioperative Research in South Africa

BACKGROUND:Perioperative research is currently unco-ordinated in South Africa (SA); with no clear research agenda.OBJECTIVE:To determine the top ten national research priorities for perioperative research in SA.METHODS:A Delphi technique was used to establish consensus on the top ten research priorities.RESULTS:The top ten research priorities were as follows: (i) establishment of a national database of (a) critical care outcomes; and (b) critical care resources; (ii) a randomised controlled trial of preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide-guided medical therapy to decrease major adverse cardiac events following non-cardiac surgery; (iii) a national prospective observational study of the outcomes associated with paediatric surgical cases; (iv) a national observational study of maternal and fetal outcomes following operative delivery in SA; (v) a stepped-wedge trial of an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for (a) surgery; (b) obstetrics; (c) emergency surgery; and (d) trauma surgery; (vi) a stepped-wedge trial of a surgical safety checklist on patient outcomes in SA; (vii) a prospective observational study of perioperative outcomes after surgery in district general hospitals in SA; (viii) short-course interventions to improve anaesthetic skills in rural doctors; (ix) studies of the efficacy of simulation training to improve (a) patient outcomes; (b) team dynamics; and (c) leadership; and (x) development and validation of a risk stratification tool for SA surgery based on the South African Surgical Outcomes Study (SASOS) data.CONCLUSIONS:These research priorities provide the structure for an intermediate-term research agenda